The WNBA's latest collective bargaining agreement (CBA) proposal, unveiled on Friday, has sparked debate among players and management. Sources reveal that while the proposal addresses housing and facility standards, it falls short of significantly updating the league's revenue-sharing system. The proposal includes housing concessions for players on minimum salary and those with zero years of service, providing one-bedroom apartments for the first three years. However, the players' association has yet to respond, having received the proposal over six weeks after their last offer around Christmas. This delay adds to the tension, as the league's previous proposals did not include housing provisions, which have been a requirement since 1999. The main point of contention remains revenue sharing, with the league proposing an average of over 70% of net revenue for players, while players advocate for a $10.5 million salary cap and 30% of gross revenue. The league's proposal is projected to result in significant losses, according to sources, leading to concerns about the league's financial stability. The WNBPA leadership is set to review the proposal, with the possibility of a strike on the table. With the 2026 season looming, a new CBA, expansion draft, and free agency are crucial for the league's future.
